Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Two Consecutive PSLV Failures

Context & Why in News ?

  • Indian Space Research Organisations Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) has suffered two consecutive failures:
    • PSLV-C61 (May 2025): Pressure drop in PS3.
    • PSLV-C62 (Jan 2026)Disruption in roll rate of PS3, deviation from intended orbit.
  • First time in PSLV’s 32-year history that back-to-back failures have occurred.
  • Raises concerns beyond “bad luck” → systemic and organisational scrutiny.

Relevance

GS III – Science & Technology

  • Space technology
  • Failure analysis & reliability

PSLV at a Glance

  • Four-stage launch vehicle:
    • PS1 & PS3: Solid stages
    • PS2 & PS4: Liquid stages
  • Known for high reliability and cost-effectiveness.
  • Backbone of India’s:
    • Earth observation
    • Navigation (IRNSS)
    • Commercial launches (earlier phase)

Failure History Snapshot

  • 5 failures / partial failures in ~64 launches.
  • Earlier failures were isolated & time-separated (1993, 1997, 2017).
  • 2025–26 failures clustered around PS3 → commonality demands scrutiny.

Technical Analysis

Why PS3 Matters ?

  • PS3 (third stage):
    • Solid motor
    • Provides crucial velocity shaping & attitude stability.
  • Failures observed:
    • Pressure drop (C61)
    • Roll-rate instability (C62)
  • Indicates possible issues in:
    • Motor casing integrity
    • Thrust vector alignment
    • Sensor-actuator feedback loop

Possible Technical Causes

  • Manufacturing variability in solid propellant.
  • Ageing supply-chain components.
  • Quality assurance gaps in:
    • Pressure regulators
    • Inertial navigation sensors
  • Configuration management challenges due to PSLV variants (CA, XL, DL).

Strategic

  • PSLV supports:
    • Surveillance
    • Weather & disaster management
    • Strategic payloads
  • Reliability dip → national security sensitivity.

Science & Technology Ecosystem Perspective

  • Maturity paradox:
    • Highly mature systems risk complacency.
  • ISRO increasingly focused on:
    • Gaganyaan
    • LVM3
    • Reusable Launch Vehicle
  • Risk of attention dilution for “legacy” systems like PSLV.

Comparative Insight 

  • NASA / ESA practice:
    • Mandatory public post-failure disclosures.
    • Independent review boards.
  • Transparency improves:
    • Learning curve
    • Public confidence
    • International credibility

Way Forward

  • Deep-dive PS3 audit:
    • Design, material science, manufacturing chain.
  • Public release of FAC findings (non-sensitive parts).
  • Digital twin & AI-based anomaly prediction.
  • Independent safety oversight board within ISRO.
  • Gradual phase-out / redesign of PSLV as small-launch ecosystem matures.
  • Strengthen role of private launch vehicles to reduce strategic dependence.

January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Categories