Afghanistan–Pakistan Border Clashes

  • The Taliban administration in Afghanistan launched retaliatory attacks on Pakistani border posts following alleged Pakistani airstrikes.
  • Clashes occurred along the 2,600 km Durand Line, escalating tensions after cross-border strikes targeting alleged militant camps.
  • Both sides accused each other of “unprovoked fire,” indicating deterioration in bilateral security relations post-2021 Taliban takeover.

Relevance

GS Paper II – International Relations

  • Durand Line dispute (1893).
  • Article 51 (self-defence) under UN Charter.
  • Taliban governance post-2021.

GS Paper III – Security

  • TTP factor and cross-border militancy.
  • Regional instability implications for India.

Mains Practice Question (15 Marks)

  • Recurring clashes along the Durand Line reflect unresolved historical disputes and evolving security threats. Analyse the legal and geopolitical dimensions of Afghanistan–Pakistan border tensions.
1. The Durand Line Dispute
  • The Durand Line (1893) was drawn between British India and Afghanistan by Sir Mortimer Durand.
  • Length: ~2,640 km, dividing Pashtun tribal areas.
  • Pakistan recognises it as international border; Afghanistan has historically refused formal recognition.
  • Dispute fuels cross-border insurgency and mistrust.
2. Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) Factor
  • TTP is a Pakistan-based militant group aiming to overthrow the Pakistani state.
  • Islamabad accuses Kabul of providing safe havens to TTP fighters post-2021.
  • Taliban deny formal support but have struggled to restrain transnational militancy.
3. Taliban Government (Post-2021)
  • Taliban regained control of Afghanistan in August 2021 after U.S. withdrawal.
  • No formal international recognition by most countries.
  • Afghanistan faces economic crisis, humanitarian dependency, and security fragmentation.
1. Pakistan’s Security Calculus
  • Pakistan conducted alleged airstrikes in Afghan territory targeting militant camps.
  • Islamabad frames action as safeguarding territorial integrity and internal security.
  • Escalation reflects breakdown of earlier Pakistan–Taliban tactical alignment.
2. Afghanistan’s Strategic Signalling
  • Taliban’s retaliatory strikes signal assertion of sovereignty.
  • Domestic legitimacy imperative: projecting strength against perceived external aggression.
  • Risk of localised clashes escalating into broader confrontation.
Sovereignty and Non-Intervention
  • Under UN Charter Article 2(4), states must refrain from use of force against territorial integrity of another state.
  • Cross-border strikes justified by Pakistan under self-defence doctrine (Article 51) against non-state actors.
  • Legal controversy: whether inability/unwillingness doctrine applies.
Counter-Terrorism Law
  • States obligated to prevent territory being used for terrorist activities (UNSC Resolution 1373).
  • Failure to control TTP presence complicates Taliban’s international legitimacy claims.
1. Escalation Risk
  • Armed exchanges along mountainous terrain increase risk of miscalculation.
  • Historical precedent: border clashes in October 2023 and 2024 ceasefire breakdowns.
2. Refugee and Humanitarian Impact
  • Afghanistan already hosts severe humanitarian crisis; border tensions disrupt trade and aid corridors.
  • Pakistan hosts millions of Afghan refugees; tensions may worsen deportation policies.
3. India’s Strategic Stakes
  • India maintains limited engagement with Taliban regime while monitoring security implications.
  • Instability could affect connectivity projects in Central Asia and regional counter-terror strategy.
  • Pakistan–Afghanistan trade critical for landlocked Afghan economy.
  • Border closures disrupt transit routes linked to Central Asia–South Asia connectivity frameworks.
  • Potential spillover into CPEC security dynamics.
  • Unresolved Border Legitimacy: Durand Line remains contested, preventing stable demarcation and border management.
  • Non-State Actor Sanctuaries: TTP presence complicates sovereignty claims and fuels retaliatory doctrine justification.
  • Weak Institutional Control in Afghanistan: Taliban governance lacks unified control over all armed factions.
  • Escalatory Signalling: Airstrikes and retaliatory artillery increase probability of accidental escalation.
  • Humanitarian Spillover: Trade disruptions and refugee tensions exacerbate fragile Afghan economy.
  • Revive Border Coordination Mechanism: Institutionalise joint verification and ceasefire monitoring cells.
  • Counter-Terror Cooperation Framework: Structured intelligence-sharing mechanism targeting TTP without violating sovereignty.
  • Durand Line Confidence-Building Measures: Local ceasefire committees involving tribal elders to reduce flashpoints.
  • Regional Mediation Support: Engage SCO or OIC platforms to facilitate dialogue.
  • Humanitarian Safeguards: Ensure border trade and aid corridors insulated from military escalation.
  • Durand Line (1893) divides Pakistan and Afghanistan (~2,640 km).
  • UN Charter Article 51 permits self-defence against armed attack.
  • TTP distinct from Afghan Taliban; operates primarily against Pakistan.
  • Afghanistan not formally recognised by most UN member states post-2021.

Book a Free Demo Class

February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.