Daily Static Quiz Prelims Practice 2027
- AThe Directive Principles are enforceable in a court of law in the same manner as Fundamental Rights.
- BThe Directive Principles are borrowed from the Irish Constitution and are inspired by the concept of social and economic democracy.
- CArticle 37 declares that the Directive Principles are fundamental in the governance of the country and are enforceable by the Supreme Court.
- DAll Directive Principles fall exclusively under socialist ideology and reflect only economic rights of citizens.
Option (b) is correct — the Directive Principles were explicitly borrowed from the Irish Constitution of 1937, itself drawing on the Spanish Constitution, embodying social and economic democracy alongside the political democracy of Fundamental Rights. Option (a) is wrong — Article 37 explicitly states DPSPs are non-justiciable, not enforceable by any court. Option (c) is wrong — Article 37 declares DPSPs fundamental in governance but expressly states they are not court-enforceable, contradicting the second half of this option. Option (d) is wrong — DPSPs blend socialist, Gandhian, and liberal-intellectual ideologies, spanning economic rights, Gandhian principles, and international relations principles, not exclusively socialist ones.
- 1. Equal pay for equal work for men and women — Article 39(d)
- 2. Organisation of village panchayats — Article 40
- 3. Right to work, education and public assistance in certain cases — Article 45
- 4. Promotion of international peace and security — Article 51
- AOnly one
- BOnly two
- COnly three
- DAll four
Pairs 1, 2 and 4 are correctly matched. Article 39(d) directs equal pay for equal work for men and women; Article 40 directs the State to organise village panchayats as self-government units, the constitutional foundation for the 73rd Amendment; and Article 51 directs the promotion of international peace, just relations between nations, and respect for international law. Pair 3 is incorrect — the right to work, education, and public assistance is covered under Article 41, not Article 45; Article 45 originally dealt with free and compulsory education for children up to 14, later elevated to Fundamental Rights status via the 86th Amendment and Article 21A.
Reason (R): Fundamental Rights restrict State action (the State shall not discriminate, shall not deny freedom), while Directive Principles mandate affirmative State action (the State shall secure, shall endeavour, shall promote).
- ABoth A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- BBoth A and R are correct, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- CA is correct, but R is incorrect.
- DA is incorrect, but R is correct.
Both A and R are correct, and R explains A. The negative-versus-positive obligation distinction is fundamental to understanding Parts III and IV of the Constitution: Fundamental Rights use language like "the State shall not deny," reflecting restraint, while DPSPs use language like "the State shall endeavour" and "shall secure," reflecting affirmative duties. This linguistic and constitutional distinction directly explains the assertion, making it a clean cause-and-effect pair.
- In the Champakam Dorairajan case (1951), the Supreme Court held that in case of conflict, Directive Principles must yield to Fundamental Rights.
- The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976) added Article 31C, providing that laws giving effect to certain Directive Principles under Articles 39(b) and 39(c) shall not be void on the ground of violating Articles 14 and 19.
- In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles is itself part of the Basic Structure.
- Following the Kesavananda Bharati judgment, Directive Principles were given absolute supremacy over all Fundamental Rights without exception.
- A1 and 3 only
- B1, 2 and 3 only
- C2 and 4 only
- D1, 2, 3 and 4
Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct. In Champakam Dorairajan (1951), the Supreme Court ruled Fundamental Rights prevail over DPSPs in conflict, prompting the First Amendment inserting Article 15(4). The 42nd Amendment (1976) expanded Article 31C to shield laws implementing all DPSPs from challenge under Articles 14 and 19, though Minerva Mills later restored it to cover only Articles 39(b) and 39(c). Minerva Mills (1980) is the landmark ruling that the balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs is itself part of the Basic Structure. Statement 4 is incorrect — Kesavananda Bharati (1973) established the Basic Structure doctrine, not absolute DPSP supremacy; that fabricated overstatement is precisely what Minerva Mills later prevented.
- AEqual pay for equal work for men and women under Article 39(d).
- BFree and compulsory education for children between 6 and 14 years, originally under Article 45.
- CParticipation of workers in management of industries under Article 43A.
- DOrganisation of agriculture and animal husbandry on modern scientific lines under Article 48.
Option (b) is correct — the 86th Amendment (2002) inserted Article 21A as a Fundamental Right guaranteeing free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14, while amending Article 45 to cover early childhood care below age 6, later operationalised through the RTE Act, 2009. Option (a) is wrong — equal pay under Article 39(d) remains only a Directive Principle, interpreted judicially but never formally elevated. Option (c) is wrong — Article 43A, inserted by the 42nd Amendment, remains a Directive Principle. Option (d) is wrong — Article 48 has never been given Fundamental Rights status.


