Static Quiz 08 June 2024
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Static Quiz 08 June 2024 for UPSC Prelims
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Regarding the National Population Register (NPR), consider the following statements:
1. The NPR includes only citizens.
2. Every usual resident of India must register in the NPR.
3. NPR data was initially gathered in 2010 during the house-listing phase of Census 2011.Which of the above statements is/are correct?
CorrectAnswer: B
The NPR is not a citizenship enumeration drive as it records even foreign nationals staying in a locality for more than six months. This differentiates NPR from the NRC, which aims to identify and exclude non-citizens. Hence, statement 1 is incorrect.
IncorrectAnswer: B
The NPR is not a citizenship enumeration drive as it records even foreign nationals staying in a locality for more than six months. This differentiates NPR from the NRC, which aims to identify and exclude non-citizens. Hence, statement 1 is incorrect.
- Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Which of the following could be considered drawbacks of a democracy?
1. Frequent changes in leadership may lead to instability.
2. Democracy can lead to corruption due to electoral competition.
3. Democracy increases the likelihood of rash or irresponsible decision-making.Select the correct answer using the code given below.
CorrectAnswer: A
Democracy reduces the chances of rash or irresponsible decisions, thereby improving decision-making quality.
IncorrectAnswer: A
Democracy reduces the chances of rash or irresponsible decisions, thereby improving decision-making quality.
- Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Which of the following statements is/are accurate regarding Fundamental Rights?
1. They are sacrosanct and cannot be amended.
2. They are enforceable against both State and private individuals.
3. They act as checks on the tyranny of both the executive and the Legislature.Select the correct answer using the code given below.
CorrectAnswer: C
Statement 1 is incorrect: Fundamental rights can be amended by constitutional amendment as long as they do not violate the basic structure of the Constitution, and thus they are not sacrosanct.
IncorrectAnswer: C
Statement 1 is incorrect: Fundamental rights can be amended by constitutional amendment as long as they do not violate the basic structure of the Constitution, and thus they are not sacrosanct.
- Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Which of the following statements is/are correct concerning Fundamental Duties?
1. They can be used by the courts to determine the constitutionality of a law.
2. They can be enforced by the Parliament through legislation.Select the correct answer using the codes:
CorrectAnswer: C
IncorrectAnswer: C
- Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Consider the following assertions:
1. There are no limits to the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
2. Only the President can decide whether any matter forms a part of the Constitution’s basic structure.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
CorrectAnswer: D
In 1973, the Supreme Court ruled in the Kesavananda Bharati case that there is a basic structure of the Constitution, and not even Parliament (through amendment) can violate it. The Court also decided that right to property (the disputed issue) was not part of the basic structure and could be abridged. Additionally, the Court reserved the right to determine whether various matters are part of the basic structure. This case exemplifies how the judiciary interprets the Constitution.
IncorrectAnswer: D
In 1973, the Supreme Court ruled in the Kesavananda Bharati case that there is a basic structure of the Constitution, and not even Parliament (through amendment) can violate it. The Court also decided that right to property (the disputed issue) was not part of the basic structure and could be abridged. Additionally, the Court reserved the right to determine whether various matters are part of the basic structure. This case exemplifies how the judiciary interprets the Constitution.