Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

The Power of Centralised Labs in Modern Healthcare

Context:

In today’s era, medical assessments and clinical evaluations are greatly complemented by laboratory investigations. Medical practitioners and surgeons rely laboratory tests to diagnose medical conditions. Laboratory diagnostics furnish highly valuable insights that aid in accurate diagnoses, facilitate the monitoring of disease progression, and inform treatment decisions.

Relevance:

GS2- Health

Mains Question:

A centralised approach to laboratory diagnostics offers numerous advantages in terms of efficiency, quality and coordination of services. Discuss. Also analyse the challenges faced by India in this regard. (10 Marks, 150 Words).

Standardization of laboratory procedures:

  • Standardization of laboratory procedures and the maintenance of precise reference ranges are imperative to ensure consistent and comparable results across various laboratories.
  • Without standardization, laboratory results issued may be, at best, slightly inaccurate but could potentially steer the treating physician away from diagnosing the underlying issue.
  • It is therefore essential for the physician to ascertain beforehand whether the tests being conducted have been carried out in a standardized laboratory. This is where centralized laboratories hold a significant advantage.

Centralized Laboratories:

  • Competent centralized laboratories consistently adhere to standardized protocols and participate in external quality assessment programs to validate the uniformity and accuracy of their testing procedures.
  • Due to the large volume of samples they handle, these laboratories are capable of reducing the turnaround time, or the total duration from sample collection to result reporting.
  • This is particularly crucial in remote areas where delays in reporting can significantly impact diagnosis and timely healthcare delivery.
  • However, the COVID-19 pandemic challenged the notion of centralized laboratory superiority, with decentralized standalone laboratories also demonstrating commendable performance that garnered widespread appreciation.
  • Ultimately practicing clinicians need accurate results that can be uniformly compared across different laboratories. The precision in interpreting test outcomes greatly aids in optimal patient care.
  • An important case analysis in this area is the dependence of nephrologists on serum creatinine levels to gauge a patient’s kidney function. It is imperative that laboratories conducting this test adhere to the IDMS (isotope-dilution mass spectrometry) traceability standard. Until around a decade ago, numerous laboratories in India did not meet this requirement.
  • Fortunately, there has been improvement in this regard. This is where centralized laboratories excel, maintaining rigorous standards of quality assurance and delivering precise and dependable results.
  • The majority of these laboratories hold certification from the National Board Accreditation for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL), which serves to reinforce uniformity and standardization.
  • NABL is a part of the Quality Council of India and has been set up with the aim of offering Government bodies, Industry Associations, and the industry at large a framework for impartial evaluation of the quality and technical proficiency of testing and calibration laboratories.

Centralized Laboratory Network (CLN):

  • The CLN, comprising 15 partner facilities across 13 countries, is dedicated to testing vaccines intended for use during pandemics and epidemic disease outbreaks. India has recently become its member.
  • Its primary focus is on standardizing testing methods and materials for vaccines targeting pandemic and epidemic diseases, as part of Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness for Innovation’s broader objectives.
  • New additions to the CLN include the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology (ICMR-NIV), Institute Pasteur de Dakar (IPD) from Senegal, KAVI Institute of Clinical Research (KAVI ICR), and University of Nairobi Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (UNITID) from Kenya, Synexa Life Sciences from South Africa, and Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) from Uganda.

Objectives of CLN:

  • It works towards swiftly and accurately identifying promising vaccine candidates against emerging infectious diseases.
  • Additionally, the network aims to foster the development of sustainable regional infrastructure for outbreak preparedness.
  • By fostering collaboration and adhering to standardized methods and materials, the network enhances global readiness to tackle potential disease outbreaks.

Challenges Ahead:

  • It is important to note that the accreditation and certification of the National Board Accreditation for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) is currently voluntary.
  • It’s widely acknowledged that different laboratory tests necessitate specialized expertise and equipment.
  • For instance, pathology, microbiology, hematology, and molecular biology laboratories each require distinct techniques and instruments for operation. Centralizing testing also facilitates the availability of a broader range of tests simultaneously.
  • Furthermore, modern laboratory diagnostics often entail advanced equipment and infrastructure, such as automated analyzers, mass spectrometers, genetic sequencers, and imaging systems.
  • These instruments entail significant costs for acquisition, operation, and maintenance, and additionally require experts with specialized knowledge, training, and skills to perform the tests and interpret the results.

Conclusion:

Centralized laboratories frequently have the capability to pool resources to invest in state-of-the-art equipment, enabling more precise testing and yielding savings on instruments, reagents, and personnel.


April 2024
MTWTFSS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 
Categories